|
|
|
|
|
EverQuest II :
The Tavern :
The Veterans' Lounge :
Sort of serious question here
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
Leawyn
Lord
Posts: 3165
Registered: 12-07-2004


Reply 1 of 89

Viewed 254 times
|

|
I do not want this to degrade to a flame fest. Let me open by saying I do occasionally troll and post on the NGD forum. I try to stick to the more "serious" topics that sometimes pop up there. I sometimes read the "funny" or "silly" threads. But I do notice something about that forum that I think needs to be brought up since there is a new forum conversion coming up.
I think the NGD has gotten completely out of hand. I can probably link several posts lately that have been derailed to the point of getting locked, or in some cases even removed. Now, reading the description of NGD, it states:
"This topic is for discussions not related directly to EverQuest II gameplay. The Rules of Conduct still apply and will be enforced."
Now this doesn't always seem to be the way things go there. I know the mods and devs like to play there as well, but I think its time to get this forum back on track. I would love to have a place I could go to and ask about RL issues, or other issues that are not directly related to EQ2 (what kind of computer should I get? Have you ever had this happen to you? etc) without fear of it getting derailed almost immediately by discussions of breakfast food or smacking people with spatulas.
Let me repeat, I have nothing against NGD posters in general, and I don't hate them. I DO NOT want this to turn into a flame fest here. I just want to express my opinions about it.
If there absolutely MUST be a forum where people can be silly, up post counts, have "last word" contest, etc, then make a seperate forum for it. Leave NGD to discussions. That is my humble opinion, and I'm interested what others think.
|
|
09-07-2006 07:22 PM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
HazlenutElf
Lord
Posts: 2542
Registered: 05-12-2005


Reply 2 of 89

Viewed 232 times
|

|
Leawyn wrote:
I do not want this to degrade to a flame fest. Let me open by saying I do occasionally troll and post on the NGD forum. I try to stick to the more "serious" topics that sometimes pop up there. I sometimes read the "funny" or "silly" threads. But I do notice something about that forum that I think needs to be brought up since there is a new forum conversion coming up.
I think the NGD has gotten completely out of hand. I can probably link several posts lately that have been derailed to the point of getting locked, or in some cases even removed. Now, reading the description of NGD, it states:
"This topic is for discussions not related directly to EverQuest II gameplay. The Rules of Conduct still apply and will be enforced."
Now this doesn't always seem to be the way things go there. I know the mods and devs like to play there as well, but I think its time to get this forum back on track. I would love to have a place I could go to and ask about RL issues, or other issues that are not directly related to EQ2 (what kind of computer should I get? Have you ever had this happen to you? etc) without fear of it getting derailed almost immediately by discussions of breakfast food or smacking people with spatulas.
Let me repeat, I have nothing against NGD posters in general, and I don't hate them. I DO NOT want this to turn into a flame fest here. I just want to express my opinions about it.
If there absolutely MUST be a forum where people can be silly, up post counts, have "last word" contest, etc, then make a seperate forum for it. Leave NGD to discussions. That is my humble opinion, and I'm interested what others think.
The fourm rules state:
"Trolling" is defined as: Posting with the intent of stirring up trouble or to incite disruption. An example of trolling would be posting to a thread without the intent to provide constructive suggestions or comments and instead making disruptive comments.
I've not seen you as one to post for the purpose of stirring up trouble, so I wouldn't call you a troll. I have seen people ask serious questions, like advice on computer parts and people responded with usefull posts and information( I can post them if you want). Now there may have been some silly responses as well, but it didn't derail the thread or keep the poster from getting information.
IMO, what appears to be the reason some threads have been locked was negative comments and name calling, not the silly comments made by people who are trying to have a little fun and make the work day go by faster.
|
|
09-08-2006 02:22 AM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
Pinski
Lord
Posts: 5213
Registered: 11-15-2004

Reply 3 of 89

Viewed 228 times
|

|
HazlenutElf wrote: IMO, what appears to be the reason some threads have been locked was negative comments and name calling, not the silly comments made by people who are trying to have a little fun and make the work day go by faster.
So, then it's not a NGD. It's a Social Lounge. Rules are not applied to it. If they were, we wouldn't have people derailing.
"Make replies to posts that do not pertain to or are irrelevant to the original topic, such as: In before the Lock, "first," or posting messages to reserve a reply spot with the intention of posting to it later."
Hrm, isn't that against the rules yet loads of people doing it in the NGD? Oh, wait they do. It was locked because people derailed it, and the post was going completely off to a tangent because of them.
Btw, when a person started a topic on Class vs. Skill-based RPGs, it was INSTANTLY derailed. Then when it was started up again, another post was made with a similiar topic that was completely off-topic from the original post, which obviously the post was made as a trolling post. It's a joke that the NGD is allowed to continue on with not following the Rules of Conduct, yet it states that it's supposed to.
|
|
09-08-2006 09:34 AM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
Leawyn
Lord
Posts: 3165
Registered: 12-07-2004


Reply 4 of 89

Viewed 225 times
|

|
Pinski wrote:
Btw, when a person started a topic on Class vs. Skill-based RPGs, it was INSTANTLY derailed. Then when it was started up again, another post was made with a similiar topic that was completely off-topic from the original post, which obviously the post was made as a trolling post. It's a joke that the NGD is allowed to continue on with not following the Rules of Conduct, yet it states that it's supposed to.
That's exactly what I mean. There was another topic, regarding having seperate NGD forums for each server, which was derailed in all of 1 post. After several aborted attempts to have a real discussion about it (it WAS constantly derailed by discussion of food) the post was eventually moved to a different forum, and ultimately deleted. I am not questioning the validity of the move or the deletion, so, mods, please don't come down on my head about it. Just merely referencing a discussion that was derailed and killed due to the blatant abuses that go on in NGD.
I understand that SOME posts do live despite the derailing, but for an NGD to feel they have the "right" to say whatever they want about anything they want even if it isn't about the topic at hand is what is making that forum unplesant for me.
P.S. i didn't start this to troll. If i was going to troll, i would have started this in the NGD forum and seen them get all up in arms. I purposely started it here, since we are all "vetrans" on the board, and I thought my point might come across a little stronger. I think the NGD forum is a good concept gone horribly wrong by people who simply don't follow the rules, and instead of being warned, they instead get praised/supported by the mods.
|
|
09-08-2006 11:18 AM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
HazlenutElf
Lord
Posts: 2542
Registered: 05-12-2005


Reply 5 of 89

Viewed 222 times
|

|
The original class vs. skill discusussion ive read over a couple of times, and I guess it comes down to perception. When I first saw the thread I thought the same thing, "isn't this a Gameplay topic" ?
IMO it was the arguments and insults that derailed the thread and got it locked, not the asking if the topic was really NGD.
I had a lot more written, but I deleted it, this is really hard to discuss without feeling like i'm "playing mod" and saying this was ok to say but this wasn't.
Leawyn, I didn't think you started this question, to troll or stir up trouble. Just the opposite, my quote about what a troll is was in response to you saying you troll the NGD. I didn't think any of your posts in NGD were for the purpose of stiring up trouble.
|
|
09-08-2006 12:21 PM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
Articulas
Lord
Posts: 8191
Registered: 11-10-2004


Reply 6 of 89

Viewed 220 times
|

|
something i think people have to consider along with the forum rules is what the regulars to that particular forum have made the enviroment like. i personally see nothing wrong with the NGD other than the people who come there looking to stir up trouble intentionally.
"Arti The Aardvark Spamma Bandit!"
|
|
09-08-2006 12:31 PM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
Leawyn
Lord
Posts: 3165
Registered: 12-07-2004


Reply 7 of 89

Viewed 216 times
|

|
Articulas wrote: something i think people have to consider along with the forum rules is what the regulars to that particular forum have made the enviroment like. i personally see nothing wrong with the NGD other than the people who come there looking to stir up trouble intentionally.
That, sir, is the problem. The regulars have made a forum that is a good idea into a forum full of the same people breaking the same rules over and over, and bragging that they "can" because "thats what NGD is." It ISN'T, and frankly I think its time for the Mods to start telling these regulars, friends or not, that they need to abide by the rules and stop derailing every thread in there with discussion on foods and sporks.
|
|
09-08-2006 12:48 PM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
Rijacki
Lord
Posts: 4593
Registered: 11-10-2004


Reply 8 of 89

Viewed 213 times
|

|
HazlenutElf wrote:
The original class vs. skill discusussion ive read over a couple of times, and I guess it comes down to perception. When I first saw the thread I thought the same thing, "isn't this a Gameplay topic" ?
The reason it is an NGD and not a Gameplay topic is that it doesn't 100% pertain to Everquest 2. The Gameplay forum is for topics relating to the playing of THIS game. NGD can contain topics about other games. But, back on to the topic of THIS thread *grin*. Yes, the rules are a LOT more lax in the NGD forum which treated much more as a "fun and games" forum than anything really serious (and when I have wandered there, I have seen serious topics derailed into yet another fun and games). Even though there is a "Forum Games" board, it spills over. At one time, there was question if there needed to be 2 boards and Forum Games was split off to attempt to allow some more serious discussions in NGD. It didn't work.
|
|
09-08-2006 12:49 PM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
Articulas
Lord
Posts: 8191
Registered: 11-10-2004


Reply 9 of 89

Viewed 207 times
|

|
Leawyn wrote:
Articulas wrote: something i think people have to consider along with the forum rules is what the regulars to that particular forum have made the enviroment like. i personally see nothing wrong with the NGD other than the people who come there looking to stir up trouble intentionally.
That, sir, is the problem. The regulars have made a forum that is a good idea into a forum full of the same people breaking the same rules over and over, and bragging that they "can" because "thats what NGD is." It ISN'T, and frankly I think its time for the Mods to start telling these regulars, friends or not, that they need to abide by the rules and stop derailing every thread in there with discussion on foods and sporks.
i typically go along with the enviroment Ma'am, and let the Mods correct us when we are wrong. otherwise, its fair game.
"Arti The Aardvark Spamma Bandit!"
|
|
09-08-2006 12:55 PM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
HazlenutElf
Lord
Posts: 2542
Registered: 05-12-2005


Reply 10 of 89

Viewed 203 times
|

|
Leawyn wrote:
that they need to abide by the rules and stop derailing every thread in there with discussion on foods and sporks.
the spork discussion wasn't a derail, it was always a spork discussion 
|
|
09-08-2006 01:09 PM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
Leawyn
Lord
Posts: 3165
Registered: 12-07-2004


Reply 11 of 89

Viewed 199 times
|

|
HazlenutElf wrote:
Leawyn wrote:
that they need to abide by the rules and stop derailing every thread in there with discussion on foods and sporks.
the spork discussion wasn't a derail, it was always a spork discussion 
I was just picking two random topics. Tho food is almost always included in many of the derails, there is usually a secondary and just as random topic that is included.
|
|
09-08-2006 01:12 PM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
Pinski
Lord
Posts: 5213
Registered: 11-15-2004

Reply 12 of 89

Viewed 198 times
|

|
Articulas wrote: something i think people have to consider along with the forum rules is what the regulars to that particular forum have made the enviroment like. i personally see nothing wrong with the NGD other than the people who come there looking to stir up trouble intentionally.
You see nothing wrong, because you are part of the enviroment. If you're part of the "problem", of course you see nothing wrong with it. You like it that way, and fear change. NGD isn't a NGD, it's a Social Lounge, as seen by when you instantly derailed the Class vs. Skill-based RPG balance. What does EQ2 Gameplay have to do with a discussion on Class vs. Skill-based RPG balance? Oh wait, it doesn't, because EQ2 is just a Class-based MMO, so it has nothing to do with a Skill-based RPG. That is why you instantly derailed it, because you thought, oh this is about EQ2's Gameplay, when it wasn't anything to do directly with EQ2's Gameplay. It is about all RPGs. Not about EQ2, or its gameplay at all. I'm sorry you have your mind stuck in such a small world that if it's about a RPG, it's instantly about EQ2 on the boards.
|
|
09-08-2006 01:13 PM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
HazlenutElf
Lord
Posts: 2542
Registered: 05-12-2005


Reply 13 of 89

Viewed 200 times
|

|
Rijacki wrote:
HazlenutElf wrote:
The original class vs. skill discusussion ive read over a couple of times, and I guess it comes down to perception. When I first saw the thread I thought the same thing, "isn't this a Gameplay topic" ?
The reason it is an NGD and not a Gameplay topic is that it doesn't 100% pertain to Everquest 2. The Gameplay forum is for topics relating to the playing of THIS game. NGD can contain topics about other games.
agreed, and if the OP would have clarified sans insults the thread would not have degreaded to a lock the way it did, IMO
|
|
09-08-2006 01:15 PM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
Pinski
Lord
Posts: 5213
Registered: 11-15-2004

Reply 14 of 89

Viewed 195 times
|

|
HazlenutElf wrote:
Rijacki wrote:
HazlenutElf wrote:
The original class vs. skill discusussion ive read over a couple of times, and I guess it comes down to perception. When I first saw the thread I thought the same thing, "isn't this a Gameplay topic" ?
The reason it is an NGD and not a Gameplay topic is that it doesn't 100% pertain to Everquest 2. The Gameplay forum is for topics relating to the playing of THIS game. NGD can contain topics about other games.
agreed, and if the OP would have clarified sans insults the thread would not have degreaded to a lock the way it did, IMO
He did clarify it without insults at first. "It's not about EQ2 itself so it dont belong in the EQ2 discussion forums.
NGD means not an EQ2 GAME discussion." It wasn't until Articulas decided that NGD is about derailing threads that Flotten decided it was time to insult.
|
|
09-08-2006 01:19 PM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
Leawyn
Lord
Posts: 3165
Registered: 12-07-2004


Reply 15 of 89

Viewed 193 times
|

|
HazlenutElf wrote:
Rijacki wrote:
HazlenutElf wrote:
The original class vs. skill discusussion ive read over a couple of times, and I guess it comes down to perception. When I first saw the thread I thought the same thing, "isn't this a Gameplay topic" ?
The reason it is an NGD and not a Gameplay topic is that it doesn't 100% pertain to Everquest 2. The Gameplay forum is for topics relating to the playing of THIS game. NGD can contain topics about other games.
agreed, and if the OP would have clarified sans insults the thread would not have degreaded to a lock the way it did, IMO
Lets not make this about one thread in particular. There have been several threads that have gone by the wayside due to the swarming of NGD regulars to derail it into meaningless garbage. (Please don't take that as an insult... its not meant as one.) The overwhelming feeling of the NGD forums is that you cannot have a SERIOUS discussion about an issue, because "serious is bad, mmkay" and then the pudding wrestling starts.
There is definately a different air given to people who post in NGD regularly. If a regular walked in and asked a question, the thread generally stays on topic. See the "Top end gaming system" thread. If a non-regular starts a post, it is almost immediately derailed. See the "Class vs Skills" thread. And not only that, the thread is then "parodied" and made fun of if not once, several times by the regulars. The OP is berated to the point of not even wanting to look at NGD again.
If you aren't a regular, and you don't "go with the flow" in NGD, you are thrashed and "kicked out," if only by choosing personally never to go back.
|
|
09-08-2006 01:22 PM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
HazlenutElf
Lord
Posts: 2542
Registered: 05-12-2005


Reply 16 of 89

Viewed 190 times
|

|
Pinski wrote:
He did clarify it without insults at first. "It's not about EQ2 itself so it dont belong in the EQ2 discussion forums. NGD means not an EQ2 GAME discussion." It wasn't until Articulas decided that NGD is about derailing threads that Flotten decided it was time to insult.
he insulted before that
"Understand now, or still miffed? I didnt think this forum had so many simpletons..."
but not to get on just one thread... non 'regulars' have posted and had thier posts responed to with "serious" answers like this if sav could have helped I'm sure she would have, and ya the coyote was coyote, but the OP in that situation saw it as a free bump to his thread (and maybe laughed?) rather then get mad, there are "regulars" that will help, but not if they are insulted
|
|
09-08-2006 01:40 PM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
Leawyn
Lord
Posts: 3165
Registered: 12-07-2004


Reply 18 of 89

Viewed 185 times
|

|
HazlenutElf wrote:
Pinski wrote:
He did clarify it without insults at first. "It's not about EQ2 itself so it dont belong in the EQ2 discussion forums. NGD means not an EQ2 GAME discussion." It wasn't until Articulas decided that NGD is about derailing threads that Flotten decided it was time to insult.
he insulted before that
"Understand now, or still miffed? I didnt think this forum had so many simpletons..."
but not to get on just one thread... non 'regulars' have posted and had thier posts responed to with "serious" answers like this if sav could have helped I'm sure she would have, and ya the coyote was coyote, but the OP in that situation saw it as a free bump to his thread (and maybe laughed?) rather then get mad, there are "regulars" that will help, but not if they are insulted
From the thread you linked:
I need some help. I spent 6 months at NAS Keflavik and during that time bought a car that I am now trying to register in the states. The problem I have is the registration is of course in Icelandic and I need some words translated. So if anyone here can translate here are the words I need:
Nytt
Opekktur litur
Folksbifreid
Varnarlidsmannaokutaeki
VLM - merki
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
VERY FIRST REPLY:
Not since the accident. Sorry.
SECOND REPLY:
Wow. Well first, hello friend. And secondly - you are in luck. I actually speak fluently.
Nytt - as in "Not Yet". spoken through a mouth full of food. "Is the pizza here?" *munch munch* "Nytt!"
Opekktur litur - as in "Open the Locker!" Something said because you've been locked in a meat locker and your face is half frozen so it comes out garbled.
Folksbifreid - slang for people are baked on drugs. "Folks Be FRIED."
Varnarlidsmannaokutaeki - oddly enough means "small word".
merki - Dark, cloudy water.
Glad I could help.
-Uncle Coyote
This continues until reply 7 when someone FINALLY posts something resembling help.
|
|
09-08-2006 01:54 PM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
HazlenutElf
Lord
Posts: 2542
Registered: 05-12-2005


Reply 19 of 89

Viewed 181 times
|

|
As I said, if Sav could have helped I'm sure she would have, shes has a sense of humor, but if she can help she does. My post was meant as an attempt to help, I have used the bablefish thing at work (long uninteresting story). Coyote is a commedian by trade and the poster saw his comments as a free bump that gave his question more visibility. This was a waaaaaaaaaay out there post and the OP knew it. Icelandic? My point is, that the NGD 'regulars' do help 'non-regulars' if they can and if they don't come in with both guns blazing.
|
|
09-08-2006 02:14 PM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
HazlenutElf
Lord
Posts: 2542
Registered: 05-12-2005


Reply 20 of 89

Viewed 173 times
|

|
Leawyn wrote:
If there absolutely MUST be a forum where people can be silly, up post counts, have "last word" contest, etc, then make a separate forum for it. Leave NGD to discussions. That is my humble opinion, and I'm interested what others think.
Just a thought, but if you moved all the "silly" posts to another board would their be enough traffic left to have a "serious" discussion?
It's a chicken or the egg question, are the hot threads about sporks because that's what people want in NGD, or are the hot threads about sporks because only people that want to talk about sporks are left in NGD. Non Gameplay Discussion is a pretty broad topic, people that play eq2 but aren't talking about actual gamplay. Ultimately its what the community wants it to be about. Theads of little interest to the community as a whole get droped off the first few pages as people continue to talk about sporks.
Regardless of topic, name calling, insults and personal attacks have no place, IMO.
|
|
09-08-2006 03:50 PM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
KerowynnKaotic
Loremaster
Posts: 969
Registered: 12-11-2004


Reply 21 of 89

Viewed 165 times
|

|
The NGD Forum is the "Water-Cooler" for the "popular kids". I leave it to them to define their own definition of "popular".
While, it would be nice if the NGD could be changed back to it's original intent of being a place to post "Serious Off-EQ2" topics .. it isn't going to happen.
When we first got the MiB's the NGD forum got amazingly organized and quite peaceful, even .. but .. then posts about "censorship" and "forum natzi" started making their way around the forums .. and then there were posts about "making a real NGD forum" off of EQ2 ... and suddenly .. the MiB's were "playing footies" with the NGD. *shrug* .. Why they didn't just go ahead and post on their own board is beyond me; since I get the feeling most of the "regulars" are either on the same server and/or same guild.
Personally, I stay out of the NGD. If it's a post in the Mod/Dev tracker; I *might* go pop over just for curiousity sake but I don't do random very well .. and that's all that the NGD does. No rhyme nor reason ... Just lots of "snack packs" & "pie".
Just ignore it and leave it to the "coyotees" of the world.
It will either even out eventually .. or .. blow up! *shrug* .. That's SOE's problem.
|
|
09-08-2006 05:49 PM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
Nuhus
Not a Teacher
Posts: 10547
Registered: 11-25-2004


Reply 22 of 89

Viewed 151 times
|

|
KerowynnKaotic wrote:
While, it would be nice if the NGD could be changed back to it's original intent of being a place to post "Serious Off-EQ2" topics .. it isn't going to happen.
Given time, it hopefully will. Two or three On topic thread replies, then the rest turns into Off topic replies, kinda stinks. I think it's ok to goof off here and there with silly threads, lately it seems full of it. However, on this particular topic I am hoping it can be discussed maturely without fighting in this area of the forums. I think the discussion is ok, but would blow up if posted on the NGD.
Seriously though Raijinn would probably be the person to have this discussion with to give feedback on the NGD. Myself I'm more drawn to the other areas - mainly tradeskills and only post off topics on the NGD - The Khacki's thread I had posted a while ago went rather well and hard to believe stayed on topic.
And no offense to anyone that posts there, that's just my opinion.
|
|
09-08-2006 10:49 PM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
Leawyn
Lord
Posts: 3165
Registered: 12-07-2004


Reply 23 of 89

Viewed 143 times
|

|
Nuhus wrote:Seriously though Raijinn would
probably be the person to have this discussion with to give feedback on
the NGD. Myself I'm more drawn to the other areas - mainly tradeskills
and only post off topics on the NGD - The Khacki's thread I had posted
a while ago went rather well and hard to believe stayed on topic.
*grins*
That will come in due time. I was hoping to foster a good conversation
here (and so far, I'm rather pleased with the decorum we have all
shown) among the vetrans, then drop a PM to Raijinn to tip him off to
this thread if he (or any of the mods, or anyone with a special colored
name) hadn't already posted on it.
|
|
09-09-2006 02:28 AM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
juliev
Lord
Posts: 7755
Registered: 06-28-2005


Reply 24 of 89

Viewed 131 times
|

|
Leawyn, you have absolutely no place complaining about people changing topics mid thread, or trolling, or complaining and causing trouble. You have to be one of the biggest inciters I have ever seen when the mood takes you. If you don't like NGD, then post somewhere else.
I can't believe the Veteran's Board has become a place for YOU of all people to chastise and complain about OTHER posters. I could just throw up.
|
|
09-09-2006 08:38 PM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
| |
 |
|
Reply |
|
| 
|
Re: Sort of serious question here
[ NEW ]
|
|
Pinski
Lord
Posts: 5213
Registered: 11-15-2004

Reply 25 of 89

Viewed 121 times
|

|
juliev wrote:
Leawyn, you have absolutely no place complaining about people changing topics mid thread, or trolling, or complaining and causing trouble. You have to be one of the biggest inciters I have ever seen when the mood takes you. If you don't like NGD, then post somewhere else.
I can't believe the Veteran's Board has become a place for YOU of all people to chastise and complain about OTHER posters. I could just throw up.
So there's no place to voice our opinions anywhere? We're just to be told to [expletive haxx0red by Raijinn] if we don't like something? Wow. Btw, if we don't like the NGD because of the way people have formed it, compared to what it 'says' it is, then why shouldn't we make a post about it? This post isn't against the Rules of Conduct in anyway. It's just a simple discussion, you just came in here and trolled for no apparent reason other than you think the NGD is just fine with its constant derailing, even when the posts are legitimate to the NGD. I don't think so.
|
|
09-09-2006 09:38 PM
|
Report Abuse to a Moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|